Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2622 assigned to Pavitra

2009-07-31 Thread Ed Murphy
Pavitra wrote: > I don't see what's wrong with these arguments. It seems perfectly > straightforward to me. > > Can someone direct me to the explanation of why this is wrong? Whatever was pointed out to coppro was apparently not done on either a-b or a-d; possibly it occurred in ##nomic.

DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2622 assigned to Pavitra

2009-07-31 Thread Pavitra
> == CFJ 2622 == > > If a judicial case is submitted to and accepted by the > Justiciar, then the CotC CAN change its Interest Index without 3 > objections. > > ==