Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2039 assigned to Sgeo

2008-07-27 Thread Ed Murphy
Sgeo wrote: > How did everyone else get barred from this? Parties to the contract in question. > Also, what's the precedent for recordkeeper v. recordkeepor? Equivalent per Rule 754 (1). That said, the rules explicitly define some things as having recordkeepors, but not others.

DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2039 assigned to Sgeo

2008-07-27 Thread Sgeo
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How did everyone else get barred from this? > Also, what's the precedent for recordkeeper v. recordkeepor?

DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2039 assigned to Sgeo

2008-07-27 Thread Sgeo
How did everyone else get barred from this?