Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 1966 judged TRUE by Pavitra

2008-06-18 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, comex wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 8:45 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Let's make this official, as I haven't seen any further discussion on this >> point in the past two days. >> >> With the consent of the rest of the appeal panel in CFJ 1966c, I inten

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 1966 judged TRUE by Pavitra

2008-06-18 Thread comex
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 8:45 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Let's make this official, as I haven't seen any further discussion on this > point in the past two days. > > With the consent of the rest of the appeal panel in CFJ 1966c, I intend to > cause the panel to rule OVERRULE w

DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 1966 judged TRUE by Pavitra

2008-06-16 Thread Benjamin Schultz
Under the concept of Don't Muck With the Ruleset By Fiat, I am inclined towards ruling REVERSE on 1966c. - Benjamin Schultz KE3OM OscarMeyr