On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Proposal 6884 (Ordinary, AI=1.0, Interest=1) by omd
> This is basically common sense anyway
> Repeal Rule 2161 (ID Numbers).
Amendment fails, that rule was already repealed.
omd wrote:
>> *6882 O0 1.0 G. Other documents
>> *6883 O1 1.0 omd Read Requirement
>
> I swear I read a message asking the Assessor to resolve these in reverse
> order (to allow them both to take effect), but I can't find it. If such a
> message was sent, I'd like to tra
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 22:25, Elliott Hird wrote:
> On 20 November 2010 23:33, ais523 wrote:
> > 6882 passed? WTF?
> >
> > If I were Wooble, I'd deregister in protest.
>
> As B became Agora, now shall Agora become B.
>
> I, for one, welcome our new clinically insane overlords.
>
Well, some of
On 20 November 2010 23:33, ais523 wrote:
> 6882 passed? WTF?
>
> If I were Wooble, I'd deregister in protest.
As B became Agora, now shall Agora become B.
I, for one, welcome our new clinically insane overlords.
On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 18:24 -0500, com...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Nov 20, 2010, at 5:46 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>
> > *6882 O0 1.0 G. Other documents
> > *6883 O1 1.0 omd Read Requirement
>
> I swear I read a message asking the Assessor to resolve th
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 20, 2010, at 5:46 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> *6882 O0 1.0 G. Other documents
> *6883 O1 1.0 omd Read Requirement
I swear I read a message asking the Assessor to resolve these in reverse order
(to allow them both to take effect), but I can't find
6 matches
Mail list logo
