On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> There are two possible scenarios:
>
> 1. Wooble was unable to gather the required consent to amend the PNP
> to point to the new instance. Since the nomic.info instance was down
> there were no registered PerlNomic players, and thus no PNP par
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 19:41, Ed Murphy wrote:
> BobTHJ wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 13:34, Ed Murphy wrote:
>>> Voting results for Proposals 6476 - 6494:
>>>
>>> 6481 depends on the state of the PNP:
>>> If the PNP has the non-c. text, then Pavitra and coppro vote AGAINST,
>>> and 64
BobTHJ wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 13:34, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Voting results for Proposals 6476 - 6494:
>>
>> 6481 depends on the state of the PNP:
>> If the PNP has the non-c. text, then Pavitra and coppro vote AGAINST,
>>and 6481 fails (3 FOR, 2 AGAINST).
>> If the PNP has the c. tex
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 13:34, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Voting results for Proposals 6476 - 6494:
>
> 6481 depends on the state of the PNP:
> If the PNP has the non-c. text, then Pavitra and coppro vote AGAINST,
> and 6481 fails (3 FOR, 2 AGAINST).
> If the PNP has the c. text, then Pavitra and cop
4 matches
Mail list logo
