Ed Murphy wrote:
>They're not required to, but they are required by R208(d) to specify
>the outcome of the Agoran decision.
Right. There were a couple that you showed as failed quorum, so those
ones are already legally resolved; the others won't be resolved until
you post the revised results.
I'
Zefram wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
I'll do that later when I have some time. We're interpreting quorum
as calculated when the Assessor resolves the Agoran decision, right?
Nearly. It's when the Assessor performs the calculations to determine the
results, which appears to be a distinct step that
Ed Murphy wrote:
>I'll do that later when I have some time. We're interpreting quorum
>as calculated when the Assessor resolves the Agoran decision, right?
Nearly. It's when the Assessor performs the calculations to determine the
results, which appears to be a distinct step that occurs finitely
Zefram wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
4965 | The Standing Court | Murphy| 1 | 06May07 | O
4969 | fix judicial turns | Zefram| 1 | 08May07 | O
Aside from failing quorum, both of these passed by a large margin.
I presume you'll repropose "The Standing Court"; if so, you
Ed Murphy wrote:
>4965 | The Standing Court | Murphy| 1 | 06May07 | O
>4969 | fix judicial turns | Zefram| 1 | 08May07 | O
Aside from failing quorum, both of these passed by a large margin.
I presume you'll repropose "The Standing Court"; if so, you may as well
merg
Ed Murphy wrote:
>If the Pineapple Partnership and Primo Corporation remained registered
>despite change of membership, then the maximum number of active players
>was 28 (immediately after #4), so quorum might be as high as 10.
We have pseudo-judgements, most likely about to become official
judgem
6 matches
Mail list logo
