On 8/1/20 2:13 AM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 3:43 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>>
>> On 7/30/2020 2:02 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote:
>>>
On Jul 30, 2020, at 12:58 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-official
wrote:
>>
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 3:43 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
>
> On 7/30/2020 2:02 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On Jul 30, 2020, at 12:58 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-official
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Holding with that precedent, "interested in judging" is no
YES LET'S DELETE IT
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 8:43 AM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> On 7/30/2020 2:02 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On Jul 30, 2020, at 12:58 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-official <
> agora-offic...@agoranomi
On 7/30/2020 2:02 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote:
>
>
>> On Jul 30, 2020, at 12:58 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-official
>> wrote:
>>
>> Holding with that precedent, "interested in judging" is not regulated due
>> to having a recordkeepor, and can be determined by a common-sense
>>
> On Jul 30, 2020, at 12:58 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-official
> wrote:
>
> Holding with that precedent, "interested in judging" is not regulated due
> to having a recordkeepor, and can be determined by a common-sense
> application of the common defininition of the term. E.g. by initially
>
5 matches
Mail list logo
