Ed Murphy wrote:
>The intent was for the first clause in (+b) to refer to the first clause
>in (-b). Compare Rule 1871, which uses the following basic form:
The comparison is most instructive. I'd been meaning to bring it up,
but it slipped my mind.
> If X, then Z, except in the situation
comex wrote:
On 12/20/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The argument against blue mark awards for excess CFJing rests on the
interpretation that section (-b), by mentioning a circumstance that is
a subset of the trigger for (+b), implicitly "notes" that (+b)'s award
does not occur in that m
2 matches
Mail list logo
