On Wednesday 08 August 2007, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On 8/8/07, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 8/8/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Proposal: Support Ordinary
> > >
> > > Amend Rule 2142 by adding the paragraph:
> > > Any player may cause a Democratic proposal with a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If CFJ 1718 is judged IRRELEVANT, anyone want to CFJ on who the proposer
is here? For the time being I'm presuming that the message is legally
from a player, and hence legally submitting a proposal; I'm tentatively
recording the proposer as being
On 8/8/07, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/8/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Proposal: Support Ordinary
> >
> > Amend Rule 2142 by adding the paragraph:
> > Any player may cause a Democratic proposal with an Adoption
> > Index of 2 to become Ordinary, With 2
On 8/8/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Proposal: Support Ordinary
>
> Amend Rule 2142 by adding the paragraph:
> Any player may cause a Democratic proposal with an Adoption
> Index of 2 to become Ordinary, With 2 Supporters. This rule
> takes precedence over Ru
4 matches
Mail list logo
