Re: DIS: Re: BUS: proposals: deregistrations

2007-05-22 Thread Ed Murphy
Zefram wrote: quazie wrote: They can be removed from being judges on them can't they?? Takes a while. I think we've got some still waiting on Peter. 1657-8, but the deliberation period has expired, so CotC comex may recuse em at will. (The CotC database should be mostly caught up at this

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: proposals: deregistrations

2007-05-22 Thread Zefram
quazie wrote: >They can be removed from being judges on them can't they?? Takes a while. I think we've got some still waiting on Peter. -zefram

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: proposals: deregistrations

2007-05-22 Thread quazie
Zefram wrote: comex wrote: How so? We have in fact had several CFJs assigned to them. -zefram They can be removed from being judges on them can't they??

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: proposals: deregistrations

2007-05-22 Thread Zefram
comex wrote: >How so? We have in fact had several CFJs assigned to them. -zefram

DIS: Re: BUS: proposals: deregistrations

2007-05-22 Thread comex
On 5/22/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [The long-term inactive players have been screwing up CFJ assignment. How so? R698 only says "Each active player is eligible to judge..."