Re: DIS: Re: BUS: one more thing

2010-12-16 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, omd wrote: > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > That's worth a test, but I think the cleanup procedure is still as > > specified by an instrument of power-1.  Haven't we similarly tested > > that dependent actions occur at the power of each specifically

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: one more thing

2010-12-16 Thread omd
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > That's worth a test, but I think the cleanup procedure is still as > specified by an instrument of power-1.  Haven't we similarly tested > that dependent actions occur at the power of each specifically defined > dependent action, and not at the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: one more thing

2010-12-16 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, omd wrote: > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, omd wrote: > >> This escalator is really boring because it's been used repeatedly and > >> I've already won.  However, it may  be necessary if I can't get the > >> switch thing to work

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: one more thing

2010-12-16 Thread omd
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, omd wrote: >> This escalator is really boring because it's been used repeatedly and >> I've already won.  However, it may  be necessary if I can't get the >> switch thing to work. >> >> Accordingly, I intend, With Noti

DIS: Re: BUS: one more thing

2010-12-16 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, omd wrote: > This escalator is really boring because it's been used repeatedly and > I've already won. However, it may be necessary if I can't get the > switch thing to work. > > Accordingly, I intend, With Notice, to cause Rule 2324 to amend Rule > 2223 by appending the t