Re: DIS: Re: BUS: ok, there e is

2009-02-28 Thread Sgeo
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Sgeo wrote: > On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: >> Sgeo wrote: >> >>> comex Wins by Junta. I award the Patent Title of Champion to comex. I >>> award the Patent Title of Minister without Portfolio to comex. The >>> Patent Title of Minister without

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: ok, there e is

2009-02-28 Thread Sgeo
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: > Sgeo wrote: > >> comex Wins by Junta. I award the Patent Title of Champion to comex. I >> award the Patent Title of Minister without Portfolio to comex. The >> Patent Title of Minister without Portfolio is revoked from ais523. >> Pavitra is the n

DIS: Re: BUS: ok, there e is

2009-02-28 Thread Ed Murphy
Sgeo wrote: > comex Wins by Junta. I award the Patent Title of Champion to comex. I > award the Patent Title of Minister without Portfolio to comex. The > Patent Title of Minister without Portfolio is revoked from ais523. > Pavitra is the new speaker. Why didn't Pavitra have the Speakership anywa

DIS: Re: BUS: ok, there e is

2009-02-27 Thread Ed Murphy
comex wrote: > I win by Junta. I've updated this to the Hall of Fame web page. Please remind me to fix it if it's later determined to have failed for some reason. > I destroy all my Rests. (This is 6 notes' worth; I spent 7 on the > original scam.) Likewise the draft Insulator's report (which

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: ok, there e is

2009-02-27 Thread Alex Smith
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 14:06 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote: > ais523 wrote: > > > On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 13:47 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote: > >> comex wrote: > >> > >>> I create 7 E notes in the AFO's possession. This fails, because the > >>> AFO is not a player. Oh well. > >> I'm surprised you didn't re-regi

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: ok, there e is

2009-02-27 Thread Ed Murphy
ais523 wrote: > On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 13:47 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote: >> comex wrote: >> >>> I create 7 E notes in the AFO's possession. This fails, because the >>> AFO is not a player. Oh well. >> I'm surprised you didn't re-register the AFO while you were at it. > > The AFO doesn't really work

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: ok, there e is

2009-02-27 Thread Alex Smith
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 13:47 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote: > comex wrote: > > > I create 7 E notes in the AFO's possession. This fails, because the > > AFO is not a player. Oh well. > > I'm surprised you didn't re-register the AFO while you were at it. The AFO doesn't really work if any of its partne

DIS: Re: BUS: ok, there e is

2009-02-27 Thread Ed Murphy
comex wrote: > I create 7 E notes in the AFO's possession. This fails, because the > AFO is not a player. Oh well. I'm surprised you didn't re-register the AFO while you were at it.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: ok, there e is

2009-02-27 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > Er, I'm lost now.  How/when was r2241 created again?  -G. P6072 created it, since R2238 had already repealed itself earlier.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: ok, there e is

2009-02-27 Thread Alex Smith
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 13:25 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, comex wrote: > > I cause Rule 2241 to amend itself to read: > > > > comex CAN cause this rule to do any of the following by announcement: > > * amend itself > > * make arbitrary rule changes > > Er, I'm los

DIS: Re: BUS: ok, there e is

2009-02-27 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, comex wrote: > I cause Rule 2241 to amend itself to read: > > comex CAN cause this rule to do any of the following by announcement: > * amend itself > * make arbitrary rule changes Er, I'm lost now. How/when was r2241 created again? -G.