Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Fora

2014-02-13 Thread omd
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 7:46 PM, Pavitra wrote: > The Rules seem to treat interpretation as a rule-defined legal abstraction, > declaring platonically that certain interpretations _do not_ happen, that > they are IMPOSSIBLE rather than ILLEGAL. This seems to suggest that the > common-language defi

DIS: Re: BUS: Fora

2014-02-13 Thread Pavitra
On 02/12/2014 08:42 PM, omd wrote: Rule 2125's capital SHALL NOT appears to be only interpretable as an attempt to criminalize interpreting the rules in a particular way, rather than to define the 'correct' interpretation. This argument hinges on a common-language definition of "interpreting".

Re: Fwd: DIS: Re: BUS: fora

2008-10-07 Thread ais523
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 17:31 +0100, ehird wrote: > http://91.105.115.57:/logs.cgi I've also got TNP2 to log the channel, and it's putting its (completely raw) logs up at , for when raw logs are useful. I'm thinking about the best way to get log emails to

DIS: Re: BUS: fora

2008-10-07 Thread Ian Kelly
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 9:41 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I CFJ on the following: > > "An IRC channel is a forum." > > Argument: strong game custom indicates that only mailing lists are > fora, and no rule says otherwise. I disagree. The whole point of using the word "forum" is

Fwd: DIS: Re: BUS: fora

2008-10-07 Thread ehird
oops Begin forwarded message: From: ehird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 7 October 2008 17:28:31 BDT To: ehird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: fora On 7 Oct 2008, at 17:27, ehird wrote: On 7 Oct 2008, at 17:16, Ed Murphy wrote: I issue a standing request (until I

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: fora

2008-10-07 Thread ehird
On 7 Oct 2008, at 17:16, Ed Murphy wrote: I issue a standing request (until I withdraw it) to post such logs at least once daily. Will http://91.105.115.57:/logs.xml suffice? (Note: Is rendered nicely via CSS - not a raw XML dump.) -- ehird

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: fora

2008-10-07 Thread ehird
On 7 Oct 2008, at 17:08, Ian Kelly wrote: On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Until this is resolved, is anyone in a decent position to put a bot on that channel and have it re-send to a-b periodically? I would volunteer, but I won't have time to set it up u

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: fora

2008-10-07 Thread Ian Kelly
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Until this is resolved, is anyone in a decent position to put a bot > on that channel and have it re-send to a-b periodically? I would volunteer, but I won't have time to set it up until tomorrow evening. -root

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: fora

2008-10-07 Thread ais523
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 09:02 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: > Wooble wrote: > > > I CFJ on the following: > > > > "An IRC channel is a forum." > > > > Argument: strong game custom indicates that only mailing lists are > > fora, and no rule says otherwise. > > A web forum would also count. > > Until th

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: fora

2008-10-07 Thread ehird
On 7 Oct 2008, at 17:02, Ed Murphy wrote: Wooble wrote: I CFJ on the following: "An IRC channel is a forum." Argument: strong game custom indicates that only mailing lists are fora, and no rule says otherwise. A web forum would also count. Until this is resolved, is anyone in a decent pos

DIS: Re: BUS: fora

2008-10-07 Thread Ed Murphy
Wooble wrote: > I CFJ on the following: > > "An IRC channel is a forum." > > Argument: strong game custom indicates that only mailing lists are > fora, and no rule says otherwise. A web forum would also count. Until this is resolved, is anyone in a decent position to put a bot on that channel