>
>
> R1728: "unambiguously and clearly specifying the action": if there are
> multiple people to whom it can be issued, I'd say intent is ambiguous.
>
Agreed.
-Aris
On Thu, 29 Sep 2016, ais523 wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-09-29 at 01:23 +, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> > I intend to deputize for Referee to issue a Green Card.
>
> I'm not convinced that works unless you say who you're planning to
> award it to. (It might, though; I'm not convinced that that doesn't
> wo
On Thu, 2016-09-29 at 01:23 +, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> I intend to deputize for Referee to issue a Green Card.
I'm not convinced that works unless you say who you're planning to
award it to. (It might, though; I'm not convinced that that doesn't
work either.)
--
ais523
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 02:25, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I intend to deputize for Power Station Manager to publish a list of erg
> holdings for this week.
>
> -coppro
>
Yes, sorry. I've been very busy lately and have fallen behind.
Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> Ed Murphy wrote:
>>> Create a new power-1 rule reading as follows:
>>> {{
>>> The Herald SHALL, as soon as possible after the enactment of this
>>> rule, initiate an Agoran Decision to award ais523 a degree for eir
Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> Ed Murphy wrote:
>>> Create a new power-1 rule reading as follows:
>>> {{
>>> The Herald SHALL, as soon as possible after the enactment of this
>>> rule, initiate an Agoran Decision to award ais523 a degree for eir
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Create a new power-1 rule reading as follows:
>> {{
>> The Herald SHALL, as soon as possible after the enactment of this
>> rule, initiate an Agoran Decision to award ais523 a degree for eir
>> thesis on the
Wooble wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I already tried to pass 2234-35 to root so that they can be judged
>> together with 2172.
>
> Well I believe it's too early for me to intend to recuse em from 2172.
It is, but I can do it. I'll take care of
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I already tried to pass 2234-35 to root so that they can be judged
> together with 2172.
Well I believe it's too early for me to intend to recuse em from 2172.
Wooble wrote:
> I intend to deputize for the CotC to recuse Murphy from CFJ 2235 with cause.
I already tried to pass 2234-35 to root so that they can be judged
together with 2172.
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I intend to deputise the delivering of a judgement by the judicial panel of
>> Appeal 1897a.
>
> You can't. See Proposal 5454 (not yet incorporated into the SLR).
Ah yes, fair en
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I intend to deputise the delivering of a judgement by the judicial panel of
> Appeal 1897a.
Note that no judicial panel has been assigned in CFJ 1897a because the
assignment of a panel including inactive player OscarMe
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I intend to deputise the delivering of a judgement by the judicial panel of
> Appeal 1897a.
You can't. See Proposal 5454 (not yet incorporated into the SLR).
-root
13 matches
Mail list logo
