On Sat, 14 Oct 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote:
If the majority of valid ballots (valid at the end of the voting
period) cast in the decision to adopt this proposal specify "OPTION A"
along with their vote, then amend Rule 2152 (Mother, May I?) by
appending the following paragraph:
If a Rule state
On Sat, 14 Oct 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> I dislike this extra option, and in particular that it only
> requires a majority to apply. I'd really prefer splitting
> this out to separate proposals so that AI=3 applies to both of
> them separately, or at lesat requiring 3 times as many OPTION A
On Sat, 14 Oct 2017 at 15:48 Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I submit this Proposal, AI-3, "Can or can't we?" (pending to wait for
> comments):
>
> --
> [The rules are unclear/silent on whether "CAN, SHALL, MAY" imply
> "by announcement" an
I don't think it should apply to MAY, only CAN or SHALL. MAY should
imply permissibility without possibility. CAN makes sense in general
and SHALL makes sense because obligations should be possible.
-Aris
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I submit this Proposal, AI-3, "C
4 matches
Mail list logo
