DIS: Re: BUS: blargh

2013-07-21 Thread James Beirne
Having only skimmed the offices rules, I am not sure if this is legal, but if it is: I assume the office of Government Waste. On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 2:45 AM, Sean Hunt wrote: > I go on hold. > > I resign all my offices. > > -scshunt

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Blargh

2013-06-09 Thread Ed Murphy
scshunt wrote: On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 1:57 AM, wrote: It's worth noting that if G.'s vague CoE managed to adequately target all the recent purported resolutions, none of them have self-ratified. Ok, then CoE on the results on adopting 7436: Quorum was 5. NttPF Now that the ratifications

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Blargh

2013-06-05 Thread Sean Hunt
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 1:57 AM, wrote: > It's worth noting that if G.'s vague CoE managed to adequately target all the > recent purported resolutions, none of them have self-ratified. Ok, then CoE on the results on adopting 7436: Quorum was 5. (Attn: Murphy) -scshunt

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Blargh

2013-06-03 Thread comexk
It's worth noting that if G.'s vague CoE managed to adequately target all the recent purported resolutions, none of them have self-ratified. Sent from my iPhone On Jun 3, 2013, at 10:45 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: > Yes. I withdraw that proposal and submit one identical to 7436. > > -scshunt

DIS: Re: BUS: Blargh

2013-06-03 Thread omd
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: > Since I just realized that AssessorDB got quorum wrong on the Agoran > Decision to adopt proposal 7435, since it's based on the players at > initiation, I submit a proposal identical to 7435 and then I initiate > an election for Assessor (it has b

DIS: Re: BUS: blargh

2011-07-05 Thread Pavitra
On 07/05/2011 04:19 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 04:47, Sean Hunt wrote: >> I resign Horton. >> >> -scshunt > > I initiate an election to decide the holder of the Horton office. I > nominate myself as Horton. I assume Horton. Note: an election for Horton was already running