On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 09:39 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>> I submit the following Proposal, "enough again already", AI-2:
>>
>> --
>> [The PNP was the last partnership which seemed to just
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Repeal Rule 2145 (Partnerships).
FOR, vehemently so.
--
Taral
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
2009/3/26 Kerim Aydin :
> Bayes has been quiet lately... are you still doing anything with it
> actively? -G.
I haven't got round to it and I plan to remove some of the more
irritating things it did before re-activating it, but I do intend to
revive it.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I submit the following Proposal, "enough again already", AI-2:
>
> --
> [The PNP was the last partnership which seemed to justify
> partnerships existing. Now it is also comp
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
> 2009/3/26 Kerim Aydin :
>>
>
> Bbut Bayes!
>
Bayes has been quiet lately... are you still doing anything with it
actively? -G.
On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 09:39 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> I submit the following Proposal, "enough again already", AI-2:
>
> --
> [The PNP was the last partnership which seemed to justify
> partnerships existing. Now it is also
2009/3/26 Kerim Aydin :
>
>
> I submit the following Proposal, "enough again already", AI-2:
>
> --
> [The PNP was the last partnership which seemed to justify
> partnerships existing. Now it is also compromised. When
> do we fin
7 matches
Mail list logo
