Re: DIS: Re: BUS: What the hell

2008-12-02 Thread Ed Murphy
ehird wrote: > On 2 Dec 2008, at 22:36, Ed Murphy wrote: > >> What would you suggest? Text is text, after all. > > Eh, just a nicer, cleaner, faster interface. Are you complaining about wikidot, or about the old site? (I've loaded about half the contracts from the early-October report, so you

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: What the hell

2008-12-02 Thread Elliott Hird
On 2 Dec 2008, at 22:36, Ed Murphy wrote: What would you suggest? Text is text, after all. Eh, just a nicer, cleaner, faster interface.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: What the hell

2008-12-02 Thread Ed Murphy
ehird wrote: > On 2 Dec 2008, at 21:46, Ed Murphy wrote: > >> I nominate myself for Notary. > > That wiki idea was suggested in comex only minutes ago. I suggested it weeks ago. > If I may, though, offer a wiki that isn't awful to use and read? > (Note: subjectivity in the previous sentence

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: What the hell

2008-12-02 Thread Elliott Hird
On 2 Dec 2008, at 22:03, Elliott Hird wrote: That wiki idea was suggested in comex only minutes ago. Err, in ##nomic by comex.

DIS: Re: BUS: What the hell

2008-12-02 Thread comex
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I nominate myself for Notary. > > I've just created http://agora-notary.wikidot.com/ and am about to > initialize it with the contract texts from October 3: > > http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/20

DIS: Re: BUS: What the hell

2008-12-02 Thread Elliott Hird
On 2 Dec 2008, at 21:46, Ed Murphy wrote: I nominate myself for Notary. That wiki idea was suggested in comex only minutes ago. If I may, though, offer a wiki that isn't awful to use and read? (Note: subjectivity in the previous sentence is rampant.)