DIS: Re: BUS: War. . .

2007-11-16 Thread Roger Hicks
On Nov 15, 2007 7:17 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Should we decide to take over B nomic via flooding them with members, we must > do so quickly. Proposal 176 of B nomic reads as follows: I don't think that one is going to pass. BobTHJ

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: War. . .

2007-11-16 Thread Roger Hicks
On Nov 16, 2007 8:53 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Roger Hicks wrote: > > On Nov 15, 2007 7:17 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Should we decide to take over B nomic via flooding them with members, we > >> must > >> do so quickly. Proposa

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: War. . .

2007-11-16 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Roger Hicks wrote: > On Nov 15, 2007 7:17 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Should we decide to take over B nomic via flooding them with members, we must >> do so quickly. Proposal 176 of B nomic reads as follows: > > I don't think that one is going to pass. >

DIS: Re: BUS: War. . .

2007-11-15 Thread Taral
On 11/15/07, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Should we decide to take over B nomic via flooding them with members, we must > do so quickly. Proposal 176 of B nomic reads as follows: It's dependent on 173, which is likely to fail. -- Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Please let me know if

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: War. . .

2007-11-15 Thread Josiah Worcester
On Thursday 15 November 2007 21:05:11 Taral wrote: > On 11/15/07, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Should we decide to take over B nomic via flooding them with members, we must > > do so quickly. Proposal 176 of B nomic reads as follows: > > It's dependent on 173, which is likely t