On Sat, 6 Jun 2009, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 22:43 -0500, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz
>> wrote:
>>> I understood that. To clarify: How soon after a player CFJs is the
>>> CFJ typically listed on the CotC page?
>> When Murphy sees th
On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 22:43 -0500, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz
> wrote:
> > I understood that. To clarify: How soon after a player CFJs is the
> > CFJ typically listed on the CotC page?
> When Murphy sees the message and updates his website.
Yep, AFA
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 22:27 -0500, Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote:
> >> What is the usual turn around time on CFJs being listed on the CotC
> page?
> >
> > It varies a lot. CFJs have been tu
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 22:27 -0500, Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote:
>> What is the usual turn around time on CFJs being listed on the CotC page?
>
> It varies a lot. CFJs have been turned around within a few minutes
> before; sometimes they take several
On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 22:27 -0500, Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote:
> What is the usual turn around time on CFJs being listed on the CotC page?
It varies a lot. CFJs have been turned around within a few minutes
before; sometimes they take several weeks. (Even over a month on
occasion, if the CotC's slow a
Kyle Marek-Spartz - KDØGTK
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote:
I CFJ on the following statement: The first game of Agora
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 1:31 AM, Paul VanKoughnett wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> > I think that's in the FAQ, although maybe that's just about R104.
>> > Original ruleset defined games as ending and beginning the next on
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > I think that's in the FAQ, although maybe that's just about R104.
> > Original ruleset defined games as ending and beginning the next one
> > when someone won, and someone indeed did in the first yea
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote:
>>> I CFJ on the following statement: The first game of Agora lasted 100 years.
>>
>> I think that's in the FAQ, although maybe that's just about R104
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I think that's in the FAQ, although maybe that's just about R104.
> Original ruleset defined games as ending and beginning the next one
> when someone won, and someone indeed did in the first year or so.
On a related note, here's a question: how many here
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote:
>> I CFJ on the following statement: The first game of Agora lasted 100 years.
>
> I think that's in the FAQ, although maybe that's just about R104.
> Original ruleset defined games as ending and b
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote:
> I CFJ on the following statement: The first game of Agora lasted 100 years.
I think that's in the FAQ, although maybe that's just about R104.
Original ruleset defined games as ending and beginning the next one
when someone won, and someone indeed did
12 matches
Mail list logo
