On Mon, 3 Nov 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 9:57 AM, Elliott Hird
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The rules, as a whole, comprise a statement stating the rules of Agora.
>
> No, they don't. CFJ 1266.
Good lord that takes me back, who would have thought my newbie mistake
would e
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I initiate an inquiry case, specifying the rules of Agora as the statement
> of that case.
Trivially TRUE.
Whenever the rules state something like "a player CAN do X by
announcement", such a statement is definitionally tru
On 3 Nov 2008, at 18:06, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 9:57 AM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The rules, as a whole, comprise a statement stating the rules of
Agora.
No, they don't. CFJ 1266.
-root
Hmm. I'm not quite sure that applies here, but you have a point.
--
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 9:57 AM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The rules, as a whole, comprise a statement stating the rules of Agora.
No, they don't. CFJ 1266.
-root
4 matches
Mail list logo
