On 11/7/19 5:42 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
Even if your scheme works in general, it might fail due to the specific
case you chose to test. “by announcement by its owner” has the word
“announcement” limited by “by its owner”. That likely makes it a different
thing from just “by announcement”.
I do
On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 8:16 PM Jason Cobb wrote:
> I transfer 500 of D. Margaux's Coins to Jason Cobb.
>
> [Anti-No Faking (although the CFJ should make it obvious): the above
> action might not work.]
>
>
> I CFJ, barring D. Margaux: "In this message, Jason Cobb transferred a
> Coin."
>
> Eviden
On Thu, 7 Nov 2019, Jason Cobb wrote:
On 11/7/19 5:18 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
[snip]
Rule 478/36
Fora [Excerpt]
Where the rules define an action that CAN be performed "by
announcement", a person performs that action by unambiguously and
clearly specifying the action and annou
On 11/7/19 5:18 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, Jason Cobb wrote:
I transfer 500 of D. Margaux's Coins to Jason Cobb.
[Anti-No Faking (although the CFJ should make it obvious): the above
action might not work.]
I CFJ, barring D. Margaux: "In this message, Jason Cobb transferr
On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, Jason Cobb wrote:
I transfer 500 of D. Margaux's Coins to Jason Cobb.
[Anti-No Faking (although the CFJ should make it obvious): the above action
might not work.]
I CFJ, barring D. Margaux: "In this message, Jason Cobb transferred a Coin."
Evidence:
{
Rule 478/36
Fora
On 11/7/19 4:04 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
Rule 2152/7 (Power=3)
Mother, May I?
If a rule specifies one or more persons in
connection with a term, then the term applies only to the
specified person(s).
-twg
Here's my logic (perhaps articulated a bit mo
On Thursday, November 7, 2019 4:16 AM, Jason Cobb
wrote:
> Transferring D. Margaux's Coins is an action defined by the Rules that
> 'CAN be performed "by announcement"' (even if the intent is only that it
> CAN be performed by announcement by a single person), satisfying the
> first criterion in
7 matches
Mail list logo