Kerim Aydin wrote:
> At the moment, having gone through this ridiculous nitpicking twice,
> I don't give two pennies for the job. Someone else can have it.
> I decline.
>
> -G.
NttPF.
> comex wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 7:47 PM, comex wrote:
>>> I intend, without objection, to ratify the following incorrect document:
>>> { The office of Grand Poobah is empty. There are no ongoing elections
>>> for the office of Grand Poobah or decisions to determine a new
>>> officeholder
Benjamin Caplan wrote:
> comex wrote:
>> I intend, without objection, to ratify the following incorrect document:
>> { The office of Grand Poobah is empty. There are no ongoing elections
>> for the office of Grand Poobah or decisions to determine a new
>> officeholder for that office. }
>>
>> The
comex wrote:
> I intend, without objection, to ratify the following incorrect document:
> { The office of Grand Poobah is empty. There are no ongoing elections
> for the office of Grand Poobah or decisions to determine a new
> officeholder for that office. }
>
> The document is incorrect because
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 8:05 PM, ais523 wrote:
> If we really want to end the ambiguity, then G. can resign and coppro
> can take the office as Default Officeholder. That may not be the best
> way out of the issue, though.
That wouldn't resolve the ambiguity pertaining to the possibly-ongoing elect
On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 19:47 -0400, comex wrote:
> I intend, without objection, to ratify the following incorrect document:
> { The office of Grand Poobah is empty. There are no ongoing elections
> for the office of Grand Poobah or decisions to determine a new
> officeholder for that office. }
>
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
