DIS: Re: BUS: There's always something we miss

Good point! I do think that argument holds water, actually. Fortunately, my patch works whether or not the rule actually defines incense as an asset. -twg ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On August 26, 2018 1:22 AM, D Margaux wrote: > Hi everyone! > > I Call for Judgement (barring twg) on the

DIS: Re: BUS: There's always something we miss

Yes you are absolutely doing it right :). Good catch. On Sat, 25 Aug 2018, D Margaux wrote: > Hi everyone! > > I Call for Judgement (barring twg) on the following statement: “D. Margaux > currently has in eir possession 5 incense.” > > Argument in favor: R2499 does state quite clearly that,