Re: DIS: Re: BUS: The slow-winning contest

2007-11-28 Thread Taral
On 11/28/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Same here. I also admonish BobTHJ and Eris for top-posting. I wasn't replying, I was making a separate action that happens to re-use some of the text. -- Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give y

DIS: Re: BUS: The slow-winning contest

2007-11-28 Thread Ed Murphy
BobTHJ wrote: As do I On Nov 27, 2007 8:26 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I also join these contests. On 11/27/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I hereby join The Slow-Winning Contest 1, The Slow-Winning Contest 2, The Slow-Winning Contest 3, The Slow-Winning Contest 4, The Slow-W

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: The slow-winning contest

2007-11-25 Thread Josiah Worcester
On Sunday 25 November 2007 18:15:44 comex wrote: > On Sunday 25 November 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote: > > The AFO consents to be contest-master of all of these contests. > > These are not contests if you read the recent voting results; you'd need to > make them dependently, although I think my s

DIS: Re: BUS: The slow-winning contest

2007-11-25 Thread comex
On Sunday 25 November 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote: > The AFO consents to be contest-master of all of these contests. These are not contests if you read the recent voting results; you'd need to make them dependently, although I think my silly proposal will be amended away fairly soon. signatur