On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 7:45 PM Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
> On Sep 8, 2017, at 3:28 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> > Re-enact Rule 2309 (The Propose-O-Matic), with the following text:
> >
> > The Fearmongor is an Office. Its holder is responsible for
> > ensuring the continuous change of the
On Sep 8, 2017, at 3:28 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Re-enact Rule 2309 (The Propose-O-Matic), with the following text:
>
> The Fearmongor is an Office. Its holder is responsible for
> ensuring the continuous change of the ruleset.
>
> Each month, the Fearmongor SHALL do the foll
On Fri, 8 Sep 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> It would be that Samaritan version though. I understand that you'd like that
> oompf
> via it being in the Ruleset and official but I dunno. It's alright.
Well, the Samaritan version doesn't require any Proposal at all,
so if this fails I'll decide if i
It would be that Samaritan version though. I understand that you'd like
that oompf via it being in the Ruleset and official but I dunno. It's
alright.
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> Happy to consider alternate implementation if you write it out before the
> end
> of th
Happy to consider alternate implementation if you write it out before the end
of the week. As you say, proposals are cheap right now :)
On Fri, 8 Sep 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> I'd vote in favor of it. It's something I'd humbly bet that it would be good
> but I just don't like too much how it'
I'd vote in favor of it. It's something I'd humbly bet that it would be
good but I just don't like too much how it's brought into action in Kerim's
version. Still a good idea though.
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 9:54 PM, Quazie wrote:
> I have some immediate applications for Official Proposals assumin
I have some immediate applications for Official Proposals assuming this
passes.
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 12:31 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> Oh I forgot the other reason: Official proposals are a good mechanic to
> have for any time an officer needs to fix a bug that benefits everyone.
> So this is
Oh I forgot the other reason: Official proposals are a good mechanic to
have for any time an officer needs to fix a bug that benefits everyone.
So this is a good general mechanic to introduce, I'm just doing it by
adding some new gameplay.
On Fri, 8 Sep 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Sep
On Fri, 8 Sep 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> Why is it numbered 1) then 3)?
> no 2)?
Oh crud I thought I fixed that.
> Also, functionally this is very similar to as if a Samaritan player decided
> to
> just do the rolls and submit proposals on their own accord (Proposals are
> very,
> very cheap
Why is it numbered 1) then 3)?
no 2)?
Also, functionally this is very similar to as if a Samaritan player decided
to just do the rolls and submit proposals on their own accord (Proposals
are very, very cheap). I don't see why that can't just be done now to try
out the concept before nailing it do
On Fri, 25 Aug 2017, Quazie wrote:
> 4 - Prime Minister should have the option to submit one Official Proposal a
> month
Adding that power is a good idea, but should be a separate proposal as it's
an entirely different gameplay addition :).
On Fri, 25 Aug 2017, Quazie wrote:
> 1 - How does Random work here? I'd like an example somewhere in the
> ruleset of what Random means and how to random.
Ugh. With it undefined in the ruleset, and not having been in any rules
lately, I'm not sure if there's enough precedent around these day
4 - Prime Minister should have the option to submit one Official Proposal a
month
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 11:27 AM Quazie wrote:
> 1 - How does Random work here? I'd like an example somewhere in the
> ruleset of what Random means and how to random.
>
> 2 - Why no 2 and just a jump to 3?
>
> 3 -
1 - How does Random work here? I'd like an example somewhere in the
ruleset of what Random means and how to random.
2 - Why no 2 and just a jump to 3?
3 - I'd love a report that just listed the Fearmonger's attempts at repeal
and re-enactment, at the same monthly cadence - I imagine an OFF post
14 matches
Mail list logo
