On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 10:45 -0400, Ben Caplan wrote:
> On Friday 25 July 2008 02:40:06 pm you wrote:
> > On Thursday 24 July 2008 10:17:10 pm comex wrote:
> > > I agree to the following contract:
> > >
> > > {
> > > This is a public contract called "The Losing Team".
I most certainly didn't write t
2008/7/25 Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> There's a point. The point is, I'm greedy and want to win.
>
Yeah. That really makes me want to do things in your favour.
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 5:47 AM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/7/25 comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> I agree to the following contract:
>>
>> {
>> This is a public contract called "The Losing Team".
>> Any first-class player may join this contract by announcement. Any
>> party to thi
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I stop agreeing to the contract called "The Winning Team"
>
> I hereby initiate a criminal CFJ with Sgeo as the defendant, alleging
> e violated Rule 174
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hereby initiate a criminal CFJ with Sgeo as the defendant, alleging
> e violated Rule 1742 by leaving the contract "The Winning Team" when
> the contract forbid leaving the contract.
It wasn't in force until someone els
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 11:00 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I stop agreeing to the contract called "The Winning Team"
>
> I hereby initiate a criminal CFJ with Sgeo as the defendant, alleging
> e violated Rule 17
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 21:00, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I stop agreeing to the contract called "The Winning Team"
>
> I hereby initiate a criminal CFJ with Sgeo as the defendant, alleging
> e violated Rule 1742
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:30 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No conflict, unless possible winning team==losing team, and the
> presence of a conflict would have to be decided by CFJ
That's what I get for not reading the whole contract...
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:20 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:17 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:09 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I agree to the following contract:
>>
>> I agree to the following contract:
>>
>> {
>> Thi
9 matches
Mail list logo
