On Thursday 10 July 2008 06:41:15 pm Ian Kelly wrote:
> I never understood the attraction of that meme in the first place.
There's a pretty good analysis of it here:
http://gameshelf.jmac.org/2008/02/i-lose.html
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
> 2008/7/11 Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> As Kelly once told some Pirates, can you take these silly games somewhere
>> else? To paraphrase yourself to David, this isn't a forum for every
>> random little nonsense game from minor subsets of players th
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/7/11 Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> As Kelly once told some Pirates, can you take these silly games somewhere
>> else? To paraphrase yourself to David, this isn't a forum for every
>> random little nonsense game
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
> 2008/7/10 Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> 2008/7/10 Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> 2008/7/10 Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2008/7/10 Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/7/10 Nick Vanderweit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> I agree
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 5:38 PM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Elliott Hird wrote:
>>If a Gamer thinks about The Game (as this contract or the real-life version
>>or just the words 'The Game'), they lose and must announce their loss to a
>>public forum.
>
> I'm immune. xkcd set me free: http
Elliott Hird wrote:
>If a Gamer thinks about The Game (as this contract or the real-life version
>or just the words 'The Game'), they lose and must announce their loss to a
>public forum.
I'm immune. xkcd set me free: http://xkcd.com/391/
-zefram
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/7/10 Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> 2008/7/10 Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> 2008/7/10 Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2008/7/10 Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/7/10 Nick Vanderweit <[E
2008/7/10 Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> If I emphatically refuse to agree to The Game, do I win?
> -
> Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
> OscarMeyr
>
No.
On Jul 10, 2008, at 11:22 AM, Elliott Hird wrote:
2008/7/10 Nick Vanderweit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I agree. I lose.
avpx
I just lost The Game.
Quazie thinks that this contract's switch doesn't work :\
tusho
If I emphatically refuse to agree to The Game, do I win?
-
Benjamin Schultz K
2008/7/10 Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I recommend having the Distributor ban tusho from posting, myself.
>
It is clear that I did not think this thing out fully.
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 3:01 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think we need a proposal or other solution to prevent this contract
> spamming the forum indefinitely.
I recommend having the Distributor ban tusho from posting, myself.
On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 19:57 +0100, Elliott Hird wrote (blank lines
snipped for conciseness, but nothing else snipped to convey the point):
> 2008/7/10 Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > 2008/7/10 Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> 2008/7/10 Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>> 2008/7/10 E
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 8:22 AM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/7/10 Nick Vanderweit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> I agree. I lose.
>>
>> avpx
>>
>
> I just lost The Game.
>
> Quazie thinks that this contract's switch doesn't work :\
>
> tusho
>
Don't switches need an officer that is res
13 matches
Mail list logo
