Levi wrote:
comex wrote:
Levi, you going to support or object to his attempt to join the AFO?
Undecided so far :)
Any thoughts on pros/cons of an extra member for the AFO?
I'm happy to support if both you and Murphy do. I notice you did
already, not in the public forum but I believe that
On 11/16/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> comex wrote:
> >Oh fine, I SUPPORT the triply-quoted intent.
>
> NttPF.
Doesn't need to be (I think). See the precedent with judicial panels.
comex wrote:
>Oh fine, I SUPPORT the triply-quoted intent.
NttPF.
-zefram
On Thursday 15 November 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
> I intend to join the AFO, with SUPPORT of all AFO members.
Judge CFJ 1783 already!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Thursday 15 November 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
> On Thursday 15 November 2007 19:37:23 comex wrote:
> > On Thursday 15 November 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
> > > I intend to join the AFO, with SUPPORT of all AFO members.
> >
> > Judge CFJ 1783 already!
>
> I judge comex GUILTY in the CFJ 1
On Thursday 15 November 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
> At the time, I was thinking that it could be useful in a scam against B
> Nomic. It would no longer be necessary to be in the AFO, but anyways. .
> . I would create several factions with me and the AFO, where I make all
> actions on behalf of
On Thursday 15 November 2007 20:12:04 comex wrote:
> On Thursday 15 November 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
> > At the time, I was thinking that it could be useful in a scam against B
> > Nomic. It would no longer be necessary to be in the AFO, but anyways. .
> > . I would create several factions wi
pikhq wrote:
On Thursday 15 November 2007 19:37:23 comex wrote:
On Thursday 15 November 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
I intend to join the AFO, with SUPPORT of all AFO members.
Judge CFJ 1783 already!
I judge comex GUILTY in the CFJ 1783, with the initiator's arguments.
NttPF.
On Thursday 15 November 2007 20:16:20 Levi Stephen wrote:
> comex wrote:
> > On Thursday 15 November 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
> >> At the time, I was thinking that it could be useful in a scam against B
> >> Nomic. It would no longer be necessary to be in the AFO, but anyways. .
> >> . I would
comex wrote:
On Thursday 15 November 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
At the time, I was thinking that it could be useful in a scam against B
Nomic. It would no longer be necessary to be in the AFO, but anyways. .
. I would create several factions with me and the AFO, where I make all
actions on be
On Thursday 15 November 2007 20:00:36 Levi Stephen wrote:
> comex wrote:
> > On Thursday 15 November 2007, Levi Stephen wrote:
> >> I think, as defendant you don't need supporters, but
> >>
> >> I SUPPORT this.
> >>
> >> Levi
> >
> > Actually he hasn't even judged it yet (nttpf), so .
> >
> > Lev
comex wrote:
On Thursday 15 November 2007, Levi Stephen wrote:
I think, as defendant you don't need supporters, but
I SUPPORT this.
Levi
Actually he hasn't even judged it yet (nttpf), so .
Levi, you going to support or object to his attempt to join the AFO?
Undecided so far :)
Any though
On Thursday 15 November 2007, Levi Stephen wrote:
> I think, as defendant you don't need supporters, but
>
> I SUPPORT this.
>
> Levi
Actually he hasn't even judged it yet (nttpf), so .
Levi, you going to support or object to his attempt to join the AFO?
signature.asc
Description: This is a dig
On Thursday 15 November 2007 19:37:23 comex wrote:
> On Thursday 15 November 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
> > I intend to join the AFO, with SUPPORT of all AFO members.
>
> Judge CFJ 1783 already!
>
I judge comex GUILTY in the CFJ 1783, with the initiator's arguments.
14 matches
Mail list logo
