DIS: Re: BUS: Supersize

2009-09-20 Thread comex
Fails, it imposes on me the obligation of not awarding points other than at my discretion (such as if I were mousetrapped, and someone acted on my behalf to award points). Sent from my iPhone On Sep 20, 2009, at 6:51 PM, ais523 wrote: On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 21:26 -0400, comex wrote: I

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Supersize

2009-09-16 Thread Sean Hunt
Ed Murphy wrote: coppro wrote: comex wrote: I amend Contract B to read: { This is a public contract and a pledge. comex CAN make arbitrary Contract Changes to this contract by announcement. If this contract is a contest, comex CAN and MAY award points at eir discretion, so long as the total

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Supersize

2009-09-16 Thread Ed Murphy
coppro wrote: > comex wrote: >> I amend Contract B to read: >> { >> This is a public contract and a pledge. comex CAN make arbitrary >> Contract Changes to this contract by announcement. >> >> If this contract is a contest, comex CAN and MAY award points at eir >> discretion, so long as the total

DIS: Re: BUS: Supersize

2009-09-16 Thread Sean Hunt
comex wrote: I amend Contract B to read: { This is a public contract and a pledge. comex CAN make arbitrary Contract Changes to this contract by announcement. If this contract is a contest, comex CAN and MAY award points at eir discretion, so long as the total number of points awarded or revoke

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Supersize

2009-09-11 Thread Roger Hicks
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 09:41, Charles Walker wrote: > On 11/09/2009, comex wrote: >> I intend, without three objections, to change Contract B's contestmaster to >> me. >> I intend, without three objections, to change Contract B's threshold >> index to 70. > > Contract B? > http://nomic.bob-space

DIS: Re: BUS: Supersize

2009-09-11 Thread Charles Walker
On 11/09/2009, comex wrote: > I intend, without three objections, to change Contract B's contestmaster to > me. > I intend, without three objections, to change Contract B's threshold > index to 70. Contract B? -- C-walker (Charles Walker)