Quazie wrote:
is there a number assigned to this CFJ?
I call for judgement on the following statement:
Agora is dead.
Not yet, but it will wind up being 1595, and the one you just called
will wind up being 1596.
If you want to reference the above CFJ in the statement of ano
is there a number assigned to this CFJ?
On 12/18/06, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Goethe wrote:
> H. Clerk of the Courts,
>
> This is a Cantus Cygneus.
>
> Judicial reform DID occur. I begged others to help. Repeatedly.
> I moved us to a "contracts and rights" based system, which in
Sherlock wrote:
(Probably the wrong time to mention this, but it appears Cantus
Cygnaeus doesn't work 100%, since the rule still references the
Registrar, as does at least one other rule.)
I came in on a CFJ, it would be an almighty disappointment to me
if I failed to go out on one.
-G.
On 12/15/06, Jonathan Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A major problem at the moment is probably players simply not knowing the new
rulesry. Combine that with the major ongoing problem of most of us not knowing
the thousands of CFJ's that have occurred in the last 14 years and it can be
kind of
> The problem is not any particular Rule. Looking back at the
> Proposal Pool, the CotC archives, the "Assessor's" reports, and the
> latest game (cards), it is clear that I am wasting time trying to
> play a game with the current crop of Agorans, even the modest rate
> of play I try to enjoy is
On 12/15/06, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Agora is dead. Goodbye.
Although ordinarily I would be sorry to see you go, your
assessment is clearly correct. Agora has been dead for years,
but because it was the "oldest, wisest Nomic", we refused to
admit it.
I hope to see you around *
6 matches
Mail list logo
