Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Star cleanups

2013-06-25 Thread Sean Hunt
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 4:16 PM, omd wrote: > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Fool wrote: >> Just have any invalid code = PRESENT. The assessor knows directly whether >> quorum is met, without decoding, or even having to cross-reference with >> anything. > > Yeah, this would work - it would jus

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Star cleanups

2013-06-25 Thread omd
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Fool wrote: > Just have any invalid code = PRESENT. The assessor knows directly whether > quorum is met, without decoding, or even having to cross-reference with > anything. Yeah, this would work - it would just be a bit weird for "invalid vote = PRESENT" to only

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Star cleanups

2013-06-25 Thread Fool
On 24/06/2013 4:36 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 1:44 PM, omd wrote: On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: Amend Rule 2409 (Star Chamber) inserting "- publish the list of codes (but not the corresponding options)" as the second item in the bulleted list. [Allows the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Star cleanups

2013-06-24 Thread omd
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: > (especially > if the initiator is also the vote collector [whatever happened to the > rule against that?]). FWIW, as the first person to be both Promotor and Assessor as long as I can remember (mainly because Murphy's been Assessor for almost al

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Star cleanups

2013-06-24 Thread Sean Hunt
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > On Mon, 2013-06-24 at 16:36 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote: >> I have no issue with throwing in another code to be interpreted as >> "PRESENT", or disabling voting period extension on Star Chamber. The >> current situation is bad though because only the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Star cleanups

2013-06-24 Thread Alex Smith
On Mon, 2013-06-24 at 16:36 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote: > I have no issue with throwing in another code to be interpreted as > "PRESENT", or disabling voting period extension on Star Chamber. The > current situation is bad though because only the initiator knows if > the voting period is extended, and

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Star cleanups

2013-06-24 Thread Sean Hunt
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 1:44 PM, omd wrote: > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Sean Hunt > wrote: >> Amend Rule 2409 (Star Chamber) inserting "- publish the list of codes >> (but not the corresponding options)" as the second item in the >> bulleted list. >> [Allows the Assessor to know whether o

DIS: Re: BUS: Star cleanups

2013-06-24 Thread omd
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: > Amend Rule 2409 (Star Chamber) inserting "- publish the list of codes > (but not the corresponding options)" as the second item in the > bulleted list. > [Allows the Assessor to know whether or not each vote cast is valid > for the purposes of ex