Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Ruling in CFJ 2053: INNOCENT

2008-07-13 Thread Elliott Hird
2008/7/13 Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > It has occurred to me that the power of R2149 makes the available penalty > somewhat inadequate for this particular type of lie. I'd be in favour > of a power=3 rule explicitly forbidding lying about one's identity. > > -zefram > I would support this wholeh

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Ruling in CFJ 2053: INNOCENT

2008-07-13 Thread Zefram
Kerim Aydin wrote: >If you really want justice, you'd admit the rules are unclear on avatars, >and make a rule to wit "masquerading as more than one individual is against >the Rules." It has occurred to me that the power of R2149 makes the available penalty somewhat inadequate for this particular

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Ruling in CFJ 2053: INNOCENT

2008-07-13 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Elliott Hird > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'm not sure I _want_ to be registered if something that goes wrong is >> illegal. > > Oh please. Using a different email address and pretending you have no > idea why anyon

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Ruling in CFJ 2053: INNOCENT

2008-07-13 Thread Zefram
Elliott Hird wrote: >I'm not sure I _want_ to be registered if something that goes wrong is illegal. R2149 does not forbid mistakes. It forbids lies. -zefram

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Ruling in CFJ 2053: INNOCENT

2008-07-13 Thread Elliott Hird
2008/7/13 Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Oh please. Using a different email address and pretending you have no > idea why anyone would suspect you were you isn't "something that goes > wrong". That is not what the CFJ is on.

DIS: Re: BUS: Ruling in CFJ 2053: INNOCENT

2008-07-13 Thread Elliott Hird
2008/7/13 Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Poppycock. E said that e joined, but knew that e was not in fact joining. > I support the call for appeal of this judgement, and recommend a final > judgement of GUILTY. > > -zefram > I'm not sure I _want_ to be registered if something that goes wrong is il

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Ruling in CFJ 2053: INNOCENT

2008-07-13 Thread Taral
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 9:59 AM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The alleged action was lying, not saying "I join", so it's INNOCENT > that's appropriate here. Ah, quite right. Something that my proposal is intended to fix. Nevermind. -- Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Please let me know if there'

DIS: Re: BUS: Ruling in CFJ 2053: INNOCENT

2008-07-13 Thread ihope
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 8:56 AM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> In the message in question, Defendant stated: "I join" and not "I am >> registered." As e argued, a failed action is not a false statement. I >> th