Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Ruling in CF 2152

2008-09-28 Thread Benjamin Schultz
On Sep 28, 2008, at 2:41 PM, Ian Kelly wrote: On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 7:29 AM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Honorificabilitudinitatibus

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Ruling in CF 2152

2008-09-28 Thread Ian Kelly
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 7:29 AM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Honorificabilitudinitatibus >> >> The others are fine, but this is Latin. C

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Ruling in CF 2152

2008-09-28 Thread Ian Kelly
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 7:29 AM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Honorificabilitudinitatibus > > The others are fine, but this is Latin. Comes from Shakespeare. According to reference.com, it's listed in the OED, a

DIS: Re: BUS: Ruling in CF 2152

2008-09-28 Thread Taral
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 7:29 AM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Honorificabilitudinitatibus The others are fine, but this is Latin. Comes from Shakespeare. -- Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you." -- Unknown