On Dec 3, 2007, at 2:32 AM, Roger Hicks wrote:
Action:
I intend, on behalf of Agora, with Agoran Consent, to
nkeplwgplxgioyzjvtxjnncsqscvntlbdqromyeyvlhkjgteaqnneqgujjpwcbyfrpueo
ydjjk.
Options: SUPPORT, OBJECT
Votes:
SUPPORT: root
DSPBCORMKPYOAFA: Zefram, Eris
AGAINT: OscarMeyr
For the re
On 12/2/07, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Per Fookiemyartug's contract, section 8:
>
> Fookiemyartug wins the game.
> BobTHJ wins the game.
> comex wins the game.
This fails for an absurd number of reasons.
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble
On Dec 3, 2007 11:09 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So you are denying the existence of nonsensical action? Over 50
> million idiots in this world prove you wrong every day.
The CFJ was about whether nonsensical text can be an action, not about
whether a nonsensical action is an acti
On Dec 3, 2007 10:29 AM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Also note that nkep really has not been defined. It is still utterly
> > nonsensical.
>
> Then it's still not an action.
>
> > The Fookiemyartug contract simply indicates an effect
> > that occurs when a nomic commits that nonsensica
On Dec 3, 2007 10:25 AM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/3/07, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > doing nkep itself is still an action which has no actual changes
> > associated with it. The Fookiemyartug contract simply causes something
> > to happen when nkep occurs. I could make
On Dec 3, 2007 10:10 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> doing nkep itself is still an action which has no actual changes
> associated with it.
Nonsense. Fookiemyartug defines it as:
Whenever a nomic
nkeplwgplxgioyzjvtxjnncsqscvntlbdqromyeyvlhkjgteaqnneqgujjpwcbyfrpueoydjjks,
they are p
On 12/3/07, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> doing nkep itself is still an action which has no actual changes
> associated with it. The Fookiemyartug contract simply causes something
> to happen when nkep occurs. I could make a contract that says:
I think you just killed your own argument.
On Dec 3, 2007 10:02 AM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 3, 2007 9:43 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Nothing prevents that. Another contract could define nkep in a
> > completely different way. Unless particularly crafted to mess with my
> > action, and defined prior t
On Dec 3, 2007 9:43 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nothing prevents that. Another contract could define nkep in a
> completely different way. Unless particularly crafted to mess with my
> action, and defined prior to my action taking place, it would have no
> bearing on the results of
On Dec 3, 2007 9:34 AM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I also withdraw my previous vote, and vote OBJECT.
>
My previous announcement was valid, as Goethe's vote was not valid.
Therefore this has no effect.
> Besides, what makes you think that Fookiemyartug is the *only*
> contract that def
On Dec 3, 2007 3:30 AM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Roger Hicks wrote:
> >(Note: The votes for DSPBCORMKPYOAFA and AGAINT are invalid as these
> >are not possible options)
>
> Rubbish. You can tell that DSPBCORMKPYOAFA is (a synonym for) a valid
> vote value, because of the way in which we
On Dec 3, 2007 12:56 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You missed my vote, so this announcement was not effective. I withdraw
> my previous vote, and vote OBJECT. -Goethe
>
If you are referring to message-ID
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, it was
sent in response to a message I sent to the discus
Roger Hicks wrote:
>(Note: The votes for DSPBCORMKPYOAFA and AGAINT are invalid as these
>are not possible options)
Rubbish. You can tell that DSPBCORMKPYOAFA is (a synonym for) a valid
vote value, because of the way in which we used it. You might not be
able to tell *which* option it means, but
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, Ed Murphy wrote:
> I also argue that AGAINT is an unambiguous synonym for OBJECT.
Even I got that old reference as soon as I saw it though... which might
even mean to some of us it counts as FOR.
-Goethe
14 matches
Mail list logo
