On Jan 14, 2008 8:55 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 14, 2008 6:52 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Naturally, however, if (say) a CFJ is submitted buried in a message
> > that has other concerns, as an officeholder I will notice and process
> > them. In fact, I will prob
On Jan 14, 2008 6:52 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Naturally, however, if (say) a CFJ is submitted buried in a message
> that has other concerns, as an officeholder I will notice and process
> them. In fact, I will probably be somewhat more lenient with what is
> required to submit a CFJ
On Jan 14, 2008 8:35 PM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> comex wrote:
> >As a non-officeholder I don't always read in detail every single
> >public message
>
> That's why I put the judge's name and the CFJ number in the subject line
> of each assignment message. And, for that matter, why each
comex wrote:
>As a non-officeholder I don't always read in detail every single
>public message
That's why I put the judge's name and the CFJ number in the subject line
of each assignment message. And, for that matter, why each assignment
is the main topic of a message, rather than buried in a mes
On Jan 14, 2008 4:48 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your recusal does not encourage your role as CotC.
As a non-officeholder I don't always read in detail every single
public message and it seems I forgot this assignment among a flood of
messages. If Zefram truly wanted to "kee
On Jan 14, 2008 3:02 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 14, 2008 2:48 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Your recusal does not encourage your role as CotC.
> >
> > I OBJECT to all nominations for CotC other than Zefram.
> >
> I SUPPORT comex's nomination for CotC.
6 matches
Mail list logo
