On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 1:40 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 Jul 2008, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Assuming that tusho is not a player (CFJ 2074), Proposal 5648 was not
>> made democratic until after the end of the voting period. Rule 2142
>> allows this, but what does it do t
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Assuming that tusho is not a player (CFJ 2074), Proposal 5648 was not
> made democratic until after the end of the voting period. Rule 2142
> allows this, but what does it do to vote validity?
Gratuitous:
R683 strongly implies that a vote is valid if i
comex wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:47 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> comex wrote:
>>
>>> I CFJ on the statement: In the quoted message, ehird first retracted
>>> one or more votes on proposal 5643, then voted on it.
>> I refuse this.
>
> Can I bribe you to stop refusing my CFJ
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:47 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> comex wrote:
>
>> I CFJ on the statement: In the quoted message, ehird first retracted
>> one or more votes on proposal 5643, then voted on it.
>
> I refuse this.
Can I bribe you to stop refusing my CFJs?
2008/7/16 Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> You gave Woggle 300 chits.
>
> Err, 150. That'll teach me to a) fix perlnomic, b) retract the equity
> case that probably would have given me all of the chits I'd
> contrib
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You gave Woggle 300 chits.
Err, 150. That'll teach me to a) fix perlnomic, b) retract the equity
case that probably would have given me all of the chits I'd
contributed, and c) attempt to tip the 4 players I thought migh
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/7/16 Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I retract my votes on Proposal 5643 and vote AGAINST * 8
>>
>> I once again retract my votes on
2008/7/16 Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I retract my votes on Proposal 5643 and vote AGAINST * 8
>
> I once again retract my votes on 5643 and vote FOR * 8.
>
Even after 150 chits?
2008/7/16 Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Good luck with that. Stop holding my chits hostage and I'll happy
> change my vote to AGAINST.
>
http://nomic.info/perlnomic/current-proposals/comments.Wooble.dispersechits
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/7/16 Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> 5643 O1 1comex a probably unsuccessful attempt at dereg...
>> FOR * 8
>
> With two support I intend to cause Wooble to stop being a dick.
Good luck with that.
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:03 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 6:08 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> 5641 D1 2Taral Pragmatic ribbons
>> AGAINST
>
> What's wrong with it?
Because pragmatism, Agoran custom as much as it may be, is not
sufficiently D
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 6:08 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 5641 D1 2Taral Pragmatic ribbons
> AGAINST
What's wrong with it?
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
12 matches
Mail list logo
