On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 7:56 AM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
5588 D2 2Quazie Proposers Dilemma
>>> PRESENT
>>
>> I retract this vote and
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> 5588 D2 2Quazie Proposers Dilemma
>> PRESENT
>
> I retract this vote and vote AGAINST, since R2186 does not allow the
> proposal to do what it c
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 7:04 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 5588 D2 2Quazie Proposers Dilemma
> I vote conditionally: If this proposal has enough votes to pass if I
> do not vote, I vote PRESENT. Otherwise, I vote AGAINST.
It's not clear to me whether "has enough votes
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 8:44 AM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 5591 O1 1BobTHJ Activate the PRS
> FOR (a neat way to get around the one-contest-per-contestmaster
> restriction!)
Thanks! Care to vote your EVLOD instead of a single FOR vote?
BobTHJ
4 matches
Mail list logo
