On 7/14/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Saturday 14 July 2007, Ed Murphy wrote:
> comex wrote:
> > I spend 2 VCs to increase my voting limit on ordinary proposals by 1.
> > I vote AGAINST *8
>
> The eighth vote will be invalid.
Why?
Because your voting limit for the proposal is determin
On Saturday 14 July 2007, Ed Murphy wrote:
> comex wrote:
> > I spend 2 VCs to increase my voting limit on ordinary proposals by 1.
> > I vote AGAINST *8
>
> The eighth vote will be invalid.
Why?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On 7/11/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Taral wrote:
>>5079 Oi 1Murphy Disambiguate CotC
>AGAINST
Why?
Why not?
--
Eris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
Taral wrote:
>>5079 Oi 1Murphy Disambiguate CotC
>AGAINST
Why?
-zefram
Ian Kelly wrote:
>Unfortunately, we don't currently have a way to change or retract
>votes.
R683/13(d) invalidates any retracted ballot, so go ahead.
>The proposal could be re-democratized by having somebody else
>vote 5 times AGAINST to cancel my 5 extra votes FOR, but that would
>just i
5 matches
Mail list logo
