Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Notary Report, Take 1

2008-04-14 Thread Ed Murphy
comex wrote: > But, ummm, is it just me, or did Murphy judge CFJs 1911-13 FALSE > without argument and without publishing the result in the database? I > suppose I didn't notice it at the time... I did present arguments, but missed entering them into the database at the time. I just added them

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Notary Report, Take 1

2008-04-11 Thread Taral
On 4/11/08, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The set of parties to the Pineapple Partnership is now, and has been > since 14 June 2007, { Zefram, comex }. No surprise there. :) -- Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you." -- Unknown

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Notary Report, Take 1

2008-04-10 Thread Charles Reiss
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 8:41 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 8:23 PM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Claim of error: This fails to list comex's pledge and public contract > > which purports to make persons assets. > That pledge has been terminated i

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Notary Report, Take 1

2008-04-10 Thread comex
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 8:23 PM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Claim of error: This fails to list comex's pledge and public contract > which purports to make persons assets. That pledge has been terminated in accordance with R2198, and despite CFJ 1876 which is no longer relevant.

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Notary Report, Take 1

2008-04-10 Thread Ian Kelly
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Iammars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > CoE: I believe that root isn't contestmaster of Brainfuck Golf anymore. Correct, I left the contract. It's also not clear whether it's still a contest without any contestmaster. -root