DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 6165-6166

2009-03-23 Thread Taral
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 11:02 PM, Charles Reiss wrote: > PRESENT (I'm not that opposed to the idea; however, it certainly > shouldn't be II 0.) Woops, copy-paste error. Would people vote FOR if it were II=1? -- Taral "Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you." -- Un

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 6165-6166

2009-03-21 Thread comex
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 8:29 PM, Dvorak Herring wrote: >> 6166 D 1 3.0 comex               Periodic ruleset ratification > >  AGAINST Why?