On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 19:32 -0500, comex wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 7:26 PM, Charles Reiss wrote:
> >>> Anyone CAN cause this rule to amend itself by announcement.
> >> NoV: The PNP violated Rule 1607 by distributing this proposal (a
> >> mangled copy of P6069).
> >
> > I contest this. It's
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 7:32 PM, comex wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 7:26 PM, Charles Reiss wrote:
Anyone CAN cause this rule to amend itself by announcement.
>>> NoV: The PNP violated Rule 1607 by distributing this proposal (a
>>> mangled copy of P6069).
>>
>> I contest this. It's not cl
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 7:26 PM, Charles Reiss wrote:
>>> Anyone CAN cause this rule to amend itself by announcement.
>> NoV: The PNP violated Rule 1607 by distributing this proposal (a
>> mangled copy of P6069).
>
> I contest this. It's not clear to me that actually violates R1607
> (although if
3 matches
Mail list logo
