DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5949-5964

2008-11-16 Thread comex
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> 5957 D 1 2.0 comex Govern by the Spirt (of Nomic) > > Probably breaks a whole bunch of things. AGAINST Like what?

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5949-5964

2008-11-10 Thread comex
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (for still not getting this sorted by number) Fixed. Bayes should vote in order in the next distribution.

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5949-5964

2008-11-10 Thread Elliott Hird
On 10 Nov 2008, at 17:20, Ed Murphy wrote: ehird, if comex promised to fix this and I've forgotten about it, please point it out; in this situation, I recommend that Wooble transfer a prop from em to you in compensation. Welp, I'm pretty sure I've asked comex to do it. I haven't committed t

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5949-5964

2008-11-10 Thread Warrigal
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 8:49 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> 5958 O 1 1.0 WarrigalAgoran History > AGAINST * 5 Anything I can do to convince you otherwise? --Warrigal

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5949-5964

2008-11-09 Thread Warrigal
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 7:48 PM, Pavitra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> 5958 O 1 1.0 WarrigalAgoran History > SELL(1VP - FOR), "propose" should probably be "post intent" Does it help that "propose" can very easily be interpreted informally, as I meant it? --Warrigal