DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5833-5840

2008-11-06 Thread Ian Kelly
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > AGAINST, very much so. There are probably private pledges that existed > decades ago which I've never seen, that were published, and never > technically ended. This would force me to track them. Pledges have only existed sinc

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5833-5840

2008-11-05 Thread Elliott Hird
On 5 Nov 2008, at 15:48, Ed Murphy wrote: Someone suggested in ##nomic (I think you were AFK) comex, I think. -- ehird

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5833-5840

2008-11-05 Thread comex
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 10:22 AM, Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > why is it voting for everything I just tweaked it a little based on what we discussed on IRC: Created commit 9b8f612: use *H* instead of spambayes' weird algorithm (SORRY EHIRD FOR COMMITTING AS BAYES) 1 files changed, 4

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5833-5840

2008-11-05 Thread Ed Murphy
ehird wrote: > On 5 Nov 2008, at 12:34, Bayes wrote: > >> Bayes votes as follows: >> >>> 5837 O 1 1.0 Murphy The rules command you >> FOR*8 (60% sure) >> >>> 5838 O 0 1.0 ais523 Reformed Bank of Agora >> FOR*8 (50% sure) >> >> -- >> bayes 2008-11-02 18:44:42 + > >

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5833-5840

2008-11-05 Thread Elliott Hird
On 5 Nov 2008, at 12:34, Bayes wrote: Bayes votes as follows: 5837 O 1 1.0 Murphy The rules command you FOR*8 (60% sure) 5838 O 0 1.0 ais523 Reformed Bank of Agora FOR*8 (50% sure) -- bayes 2008-11-02 18:44:42 + why is it voting for everything -- ehird

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5833-5840

2008-11-04 Thread Ed Murphy
0x44 wrote: >> 5833 D 1 2.0 Murphy No involuntary recordkeepors >> > SELL(2VP - F) * 2 >> 5840 D 1 2.0 rootNo accounting of private assets >> > SELL(2VP) * 2 Note that caste doesn't apply to democratic proposals. (How did I manage to forget about Support Democ

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5833-5840

2008-11-04 Thread Ed Murphy
root wrote: >> 5836 D 1 2.0 Murphy Generalize continuity > FOR > >> 5838 O 0 1.0 ais523 Reformed Bank of Agora > AGAINST x 2 "no vote" announcements are recommended (to guard against my possibly mis-entering votes), especially when voting on multiple batches at once.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5833-5840

2008-11-04 Thread Ian Kelly
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 4 Nov 2008, Pavitra wrote: >>> 5839 D 1 2.0 Goethe NOT GUILTY >> AGAINST. Agora is not the USA. > > Um, was thinking of British system actually which originated this. > Dunno much about French etc., do

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5833-5840

2008-11-04 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008, Pavitra wrote: >> 5839 D 1 2.0 Goethe NOT GUILTY > AGAINST. Agora is not the USA. Um, was thinking of British system actually which originated this. Dunno much about French etc., do they have all these gradations? I thought Guilty/not guilty was pretty universa

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5833-5840

2008-11-04 Thread Ian Kelly
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 15:28 -0700, Ian Kelly wrote: >> > 5833 D 1 2.0 Murphy No involuntary recordkeepors >> FOR >> > 5834 D 1 3.0 Goethe Powered defines v0.3 >> FOR >> > 5835 D 1 2.0 Goethe

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5833-5840

2008-11-04 Thread Alex Smith
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 15:28 -0700, Ian Kelly wrote: > > 5833 D 1 2.0 Murphy No involuntary recordkeepors > FOR > > 5834 D 1 3.0 Goethe Powered defines v0.3 > FOR > > 5835 D 1 2.0 Goethe pledge fixup > FOR > > 5836 D 1 2.0 Murphy Generalize continu