On 1 Nov 2008, at 06:05, Roger Hicks wrote:
5828 D 2 2.0 Wooble More contests
AGAINST - Don't fix what isn't brokenthe PRS does this just fine.
Of course it's broken. the PRS is a stupid hack that gets around the
rules but had to
be ACTIVATED by the rules!
--
ehird
On 30 Oct 2008, at 15:26, Ed Murphy wrote:
Second vote ineffective because you're in the chokey.
Similarly for the rest, of course.
:'(
--
ehird
ehird wrote:
>> NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
>> 5823 D 1 2.0 rootSecure contract adjustments
> FOR*2
Second vote ineffective because it's democratic.
>> 5824 O 1 1.0 rootClean-up on Aisle 2192
> AGAINST*2
Second vote ineffective because you're in the ch
comex wrote:
>> 5830 D 1 3.0 Murphy Spread democracy
> FOR, although it sort of punishes involvement. For example, I
> wouldn't want to leave either the AFO or Bayes.
Partnerships wouldn't lose votes for having players as parties,
but for lacking sufficient non-players as parties.
4 matches
Mail list logo
