On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 10:45 AM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hmm, why are these proposals out of order?
> Proposals don't have to be distributed in any particular order, nor
> numbered. The PNP assigns temporary numbers (small numbers like 1 or 2)
> to proposals until they're allocated the
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 10:30 -0400, comex wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 8:44 AM, The PerlNomic Partnership
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
>
> Hmm, why are these proposals out of order?
Proposals don't have to be distributed in any particular order, nor
num
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 10:30 AM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm, why are these proposals out of order?
My guess is it's caused by perl's glob() using ASCII sorting by
default, but there's no guarantee that proposals will get added to the
pool in the order they're submitted anyway.
On 7 Oct 2008, at 14:00, Bayes wrote:
Bayes votes as follows:
5756 O 1 1.0 comex cdm014, Zefram, avpx, Ivan Hope,
root, Murphy (fixed)
FOR*2 (36% sure)
5762 O 1 1.0 comex The Endless Repeals: 2164.2
FOR*2 (47% sure)
5763 O 1 1.0 comex The Endl
4 matches
Mail list logo
