On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Taral announcing "Of /course/ I (vote for / support) this!" in response
> to something-or-other.
You have a long memory:
Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 00:02:17 -0500
From: Taral
To: agora-busin...@agoranomic.org
Subject: Re: BUS: Inhuman rights campa
ais523 wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 13:01 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> comex wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:56 AM, The PerlNomic Partnership
>>> wrote:
NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
6167 D 1 3.0 comex Foo
>>> I intend, without objection, to ratify the fo
On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 13:01 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> comex wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:56 AM, The PerlNomic Partnership
> > wrote:
> >> NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
> >> 6167 D 1 3.0 comex Foo
> >
> > I intend, without objection, to ratify the following docum
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 12:18 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> I firmly believe that the publication of a false fact is inherently
>> misleading. If it is done purposefully, it is purposefully misleading.
>>
>> I do see your argument. What you claim is that you
On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 12:18 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I firmly believe that the publication of a false fact is inherently
> misleading. If it is done purposefully, it is purposefully misleading.
>
> I do see your argument. What you claim is that you published a document,
> and that it's not y
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I firmly believe that the publication of a false fact is inherently
> misleading. If it is done purposefully, it is purposefully misleading.
>
> I do see your argument. What you claim is that you published a document,
> and that it's not your
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, comex wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> Attempts to ratify a deliberately inaccurate gamestate are inherently
>> misleading. This may be EXCUSED if the gamestate can't be reconstructed
>> (so there's a reason for it), but otherwise it is not.
Charles Reiss wrote:
> Actually, let's try this again.
>
> I retract all my votes on the decision to adopt proposal 6167.
>
> I submit the following ballot:
> {
> decision to adopt proposal 6167: AGAINST
> }
>
> -woggle
>
woggle's got the right idea here.
I retract all my votes on the decisio
On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 10:13 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I object to the intent. I vote AGAINST 6167. I raise the point
> that a record of votes is part of resolving a decision, but not actually
> part of anyone's Report as far as I can tell (that must be explicitly
> defined as being part of a Re
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 08:56 -0700, The PerlNomic Partnership wrote:
>> Proposal pool: empty
>
> I NoV against comex for violating the power-2 rule 1742 by violating the
> PNP by causing it to fail to meet all its obligations. I contest that
>
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Attempts to ratify a deliberately inaccurate gamestate are inherently
> misleading. This may be EXCUSED if the gamestate can't be reconstructed
> (so there's a reason for it), but otherwise it is not. -Goethe
You're trying to shoehorn my a
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, comex wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> 1. Attempting to ratify a false fact essentially "misleads" everyone
>> in the game into accepting it as truth or effectiveness.
>> 2. In terms of double penalties, comex is wholly unrepentant on
>> repe
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> 1. Attempting to ratify a false fact essentially "misleads" everyone
> in the game into accepting it as truth or effectiveness.
> 2. In terms of double penalties, comex is wholly unrepentant on
> repeated uses of such tecniques.
The message
13 matches
Mail list logo
