Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of Proposals 7084-7093

2011-07-09 Thread Ed Murphy
omd wrote: > On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Eric Stucky wrote: >>> 7086 3 Â G., etc. Â Â Â Â Jig-jiggery jig-jiggery >> MURPH/PRESENT > > Although the intent is clear, I think the language of R2280 makes this > evaluate to "MURPH*2, PRESENT*2". It'll be covered by CFJ 3064 (which I'll rot

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of Proposals 7084-7093

2011-07-08 Thread omd
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Eric Stucky wrote: >> 7086 3   G., etc.         Jig-jiggery jig-jiggery > MURPH/PRESENT Although the intent is clear, I think the language of R2280 makes this evaluate to "MURPH*2, PRESENT*2".

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of Proposals 7084-7093

2011-07-08 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Tanner Swett wrote: > > 7086 3   G., etc.         Jig-jiggery jig-jiggery > MURPH Proto: The Patent Title Decisionmaker-N, to be awarded by the Assessor to a player if, at the time the voting period ends for a decision with an AI of N, an index equal to the number of vali

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of Proposals 7084-7093

2011-07-06 Thread omd
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Charles Walker wrote: > On 4 July 2011 19:56, omd wrote: >> Pool report: The Proposal Pool is empty. > > CoE: Not true. There's "18th Birthday Bash" by scshunt, "Like Me, > Missing Its Birthday By A Few Days" and "Multinationality" (both > authored by you), to nam