Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of Proposals 7074-7076

2011-06-09 Thread Jonathan Rouillard
Why shouldn't we? =P ~ Roujo On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Pavitra wrote: > On 06/09/2011 12:30 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, omd wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > 7076 1   omd       No harm in knowing there's a betting market AGAIN

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of Proposals 7074-7076

2011-06-09 Thread Pavitra
On 06/09/2011 12:30 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, omd wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: 7076 1 omd No harm in knowing there's a betting market >>> AGAINST >> >> Can I ask why? > > I like the first rule of the betting market. Proto: Eac

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of Proposals 7074-7076

2011-06-09 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, omd wrote: > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > >> 7076 1   omd       No harm in knowing there's a betting market > > AGAINST > > Can I ask why? I like the first rule of the betting market.

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of Proposals 7074-7076

2011-06-08 Thread omd
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> 7076 1   omd       No harm in knowing there's a betting market > AGAINST Can I ask why?

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of Proposals 7074-7076

2011-06-05 Thread Ed Murphy
ehird wrote: > On 4 June 2011 05:07, omd wrote: >> 7074 2  Walker   Spending Points v2 > AGAINT >> 7075 3  scshunt  Proposals Are Atomic > AGAINT >> 7076 1  omd    No harm in knowing there's a betting market > AGAINT > > means FOR I'm interpreting this as "in this message, 'AGA