> On Sep 6, 2017, at 12:34 AM, V.J Rada wrote:
>
> if retraction does not work, quazie (or anyone else) can always state
> 24 hours notice for amending or destroying the agency in a way that
> doesn't make me own quazie, but that will still leave a small time
> window in which I own quazie.
Thi
I know, I was just pointing out for future notice.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Wed, 6 Sep 2017, V.J Rada wrote:
actually no because the agency's name is invalid, so it is not an agency.
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 2:34 PM, V.J Rada wrote:
if retraction does not work, quazie (or anyone else) can always
actually no because the agency's name is invalid, so it is not an agency.
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 2:34 PM, V.J Rada wrote:
> if retraction does not work, quazie (or anyone else) can always state
> 24 hours notice for amending or destroying the agency in a way that
> doesn't make me own quazie, but
if retraction does not work, quazie (or anyone else) can always state
24 hours notice for amending or destroying the agency in a way that
doesn't make me own quazie, but that will still leave a small time
window in which I own quazie.
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Wed
On Wed, 6 Sep 2017, Quazie wrote:
I rescind the quoted intent.
I retract the quoted intent.
I don't think Rule 1728 pays any attention to such retractions.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
I protest the now retracted intent. I formally request that all
agencies so vulnerable to exploitation be considered a public menace,
and be destroyed with extreme prejudice.
-Aris
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 9:20 PM, Quazie wrote:
> I rescind the quoted intent.
> I retract the quoted intent.
>
> I w
6 matches
Mail list logo
